Is Bush An Anarchist?
Follow me if you can, I'm kind of drunk. I mean no offense to any conservative branch of anarchism out there, I'm just thinking as I type.
So here is this guy, this one guy who took advantage of a chaotic situation to further his own personal ambitions. The only people to profit from this silly war are the "contractors" ie, mostly just Haliburton. And they have like lost track of way lots of money, yeah right I belive that. They just want to drain America dry so they can really rule through fear disguised as protection. EVIL!! They are the evil empire, but think about it, the empire is so few people really, the average American is just a cog, the empire is small and therefore only interested in it's own interests. It uses the enemy (anyone muslim and evil) and it uses anarchy.
If someone uses anarchy are they not anarchists?? Isn't that what anarchy is? Disregard of governments in this case global, and disregard of any rules, ie torture, conventions, all that jazz.
I'm scared. Anarchy can mean that the people who are so used to order will cling to whatever they perceive of as order and chaos will laugh in Hell.
Anyone get my drift? Without namecalling? I'm just thinking and would like some perspective. I understand fascism, could there not be fascist anarchy? Bastards that have learned to use chaos to their own ends?
I'm scared!
So here is this guy, this one guy who took advantage of a chaotic situation to further his own personal ambitions. The only people to profit from this silly war are the "contractors" ie, mostly just Haliburton. And they have like lost track of way lots of money, yeah right I belive that. They just want to drain America dry so they can really rule through fear disguised as protection. EVIL!! They are the evil empire, but think about it, the empire is so few people really, the average American is just a cog, the empire is small and therefore only interested in it's own interests. It uses the enemy (anyone muslim and evil) and it uses anarchy.
If someone uses anarchy are they not anarchists?? Isn't that what anarchy is? Disregard of governments in this case global, and disregard of any rules, ie torture, conventions, all that jazz.
I'm scared. Anarchy can mean that the people who are so used to order will cling to whatever they perceive of as order and chaos will laugh in Hell.
Anyone get my drift? Without namecalling? I'm just thinking and would like some perspective. I understand fascism, could there not be fascist anarchy? Bastards that have learned to use chaos to their own ends?
I'm scared!
Comments
Is it like in 1984? Where the warzone is maintained but shifts slightly just to keep the war going? Is the aim constant civil war on three changing fronts?
It is not safer for the average citizen, now you are being silly. The Iraqis rebuilt after the first war all by themselves. Now, things are destroyed all over again and Haliburton gets to spend all the money on whatever they are spending it on but it isn't re-construction.
What ever happened to those WMD?
Are you saying that is not true?
When were the WMD recovered? This is the first I've ever heard of anything like that, in fact I saw Bush on TV showing pictures of himself looking for them under his couch.
They weren't there so where are they?
Where were they recovered from and when?
Educate me.
Even coalition military spokesmen said the weapons were likely to be a leftover from the Iran-Iraq war fought during the Eighties when mustard gas was widely used.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1120720,00.html
Is this the mustard gas you're talking about?
They're doing a pretty decent job of fighting the greatest army on earth, if they had risen against Saddam the whole world would have backed them but they didn't.
I asked you why and you said I was silly and went off on a tangent.
You are also the ONLY person I know to have ever claimed that the WMD Bush et all went on about have been found, yet you offer me no link to the proof of that. You suddenly offer that they have been moved to Syria, I have heard that.
But where do you get your news? I was going to use a Fox link but I always get yelled at for that.
I was not ranting, I was only stating facts. Yes, Saddam did have a number of WMD, prior to the 1991 Gulf War. Possibly some of this is still hidden in the Iraqi sands, although as time goes on I find this less and less likely (and none of this had anything to do with the US or with 9/11). The fact of the matter is that the containment policies put into place after the Gulf War worked. Saddam had no capability of producing anything that would be of any threat to anyone. I trust Colin Powell far more than I trust some idiot with a right-wing message board spouting off about 4 15 year old tons of VX claiming that this justifies the war in Iraq.
In fact, the UN had found quite a bit of material from the Gulf War, and had stockpiled it in sealed containters. AFTER the invasion, these sealed containers were found littered across Iraq, because the UN had been expelled and US soldiers thought it better to defend the oil ministry than to defend the only known stockpiles of WMD in existence in Iraq.