Is Bush An Anarchist?

Follow me if you can, I'm kind of drunk. I mean no offense to any conservative branch of anarchism out there, I'm just thinking as I type.

So here is this guy, this one guy who took advantage of a chaotic situation to further his own personal ambitions. The only people to profit from this silly war are the "contractors" ie, mostly just Haliburton. And they have like lost track of way lots of money, yeah right I belive that. They just want to drain America dry so they can really rule through fear disguised as protection. EVIL!! They are the evil empire, but think about it, the empire is so few people really, the average American is just a cog, the empire is small and therefore only interested in it's own interests. It uses the enemy (anyone muslim and evil) and it uses anarchy.

If someone uses anarchy are they not anarchists?? Isn't that what anarchy is? Disregard of governments in this case global, and disregard of any rules, ie torture, conventions, all that jazz.

I'm scared. Anarchy can mean that the people who are so used to order will cling to whatever they perceive of as order and chaos will laugh in Hell.

Anyone get my drift? Without namecalling? I'm just thinking and would like some perspective. I understand fascism, could there not be fascist anarchy? Bastards that have learned to use chaos to their own ends?

I'm scared!

Comments

tescosuicide said…
I think you're using the term anarchy in the wrong context - what Bush is doing (well, the American military actually) is peace keeping really but as far as taking over a government, that was just plain war. I'm scared of Muslims as well (if that's what you're saying) not the 'good' Muslims or should I say NON PRACTICING Muslims - considering their Qur'an says to behead all us non believers. I say kill them first.
AnnieAngel said…
Peace keeping? How so?
AnnieAngel said…
I'm off to bed. Night all.
tescosuicide said…
It's a position of maintaining a warzone... like our stay in Germany after ww2.
AnnieAngel said…
What is the purpose in maintaining a warzone?
Anonymous said…
I WANT TO LICK YOUR TITS
AnnieAngel said…
It's good to want things! It shows you have ambition!
tescosuicide said…
Duh... so it doesn't go back to what it was. Could you imagine if some radical took over where Hitler left off? We NEEDED to be there to keep that from happening. And now, another Saddam? Not too cool.
AnnieAngel said…
So we need to maintain a warzone in Iraq? All that is doing is creating chaos, people are dying everyday in alarming numbers, radicals like Sadr are taking over it's just a big mess.

Is it like in 1984? Where the warzone is maintained but shifts slightly just to keep the war going? Is the aim constant civil war on three changing fronts?
tescosuicide said…
The insurgents are causing the chaos and will continue to in both Iraq and Afgan until the people of both countries gain control. The same shit happened in WW2... with a lot more deaths.
AnnieAngel said…
Who created the insurgents?
AnnieAngel said…
Why didn't Allah have the insurgents take care of Saddam?
tescosuicide said…
Now you're just being silly. Neither one of us have had to deal with a life even remotely close to what those people over there have had to -it's neat and cool to sit back and criticize what America is doing over there but the reality is, they want us there -there are no more rape rooms, people are allowed to work and women are allowed to exist without shame. Even with the chaos that still exists and will probably exist for years more, it's safer for the average citizen than it was -there is now a ground to start building that would never have existed with Saddam in power. Until the entire would wakes up one day and says, 'gee, I love my brothers and sisters of the planet, and I never want more than I already have...' we'll have war. Wake up, it ain't gonna happen.
AnnieAngel said…
Actually I have a friend from Iraq, Christian dude who liked his country. Women lived without "shame", it was a secular society in that regard, won't be for long now though!

It is not safer for the average citizen, now you are being silly. The Iraqis rebuilt after the first war all by themselves. Now, things are destroyed all over again and Haliburton gets to spend all the money on whatever they are spending it on but it isn't re-construction.

What ever happened to those WMD?
tescosuicide said…
What do you mean what happened to them? We recovered them. I thought that was obvious. So, let me get this straight, the Iraqi peole re-built the country as Saddam handed out lemonade and cookies right? I think it's a bad idea to get the news from fat film makers that don't believe in showers. Makes for a very one way discussion.
Let me know when you're back on the planet.
AnnieAngel said…
Actually, I got my news from a guy who lived in Iraq. Iraqi's rebuilt the country after the first war.

Are you saying that is not true?

When were the WMD recovered? This is the first I've ever heard of anything like that, in fact I saw Bush on TV showing pictures of himself looking for them under his couch.

They weren't there so where are they?

Where were they recovered from and when?

Educate me.
tescosuicide said…
You can't be serious... unless of course you believe a WMD, a, b or c level is simply a big black iron ball with a fuse sticking out of it with "USA or bust" printed on the side. VX used for the worst form of mustard gas was recovered in mass numbers. Maybe you should ask your source what Saddam's preferred weapon has always been... what he used on American troops in the early nineties and what he used, or should I say experimented with on his own people (who were living so well mind you) Once you have that answer, could you come back and entertain me with your perfect world theories again?
AnnieAngel said…
However, the find of a small amount of mortar shells is unlikely to satisfy a growing chorus of criticism that the much-touted weapons of mass destruction either never existed or were destroyed years ago. The Danish team has found only 36 mortar rounds buried in desert about 45 miles from Al Amarah, a southern town. But it added that up to a 100 more could still be hidden at the location. The rounds were in plastic bags and some were leaking. It seems they had been buried for at least 10 years.

Even coalition military spokesmen said the weapons were likely to be a leftover from the Iran-Iraq war fought during the Eighties when mustard gas was widely used.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1120720,00.html

Is this the mustard gas you're talking about?
AnnieAngel said…
To get that link you'll have to click this thread topic, for some reason it can't be read if you are reading in the post a comment page.
tescosuicide said…
Actually, I was talking more about the discoveries surrounding and including Tuwaitha. Not storage bags. Go back to the web and search some more. And on that note, do you trust a person like Saddam? Let me ask this, would you house him?? Or anyone like him? I wouldn't... I don't believe that he suddenly, after having lost the Gulf war, he suddenly turned a new leaf. The man is psychotic. If he had even a trace of VX that we were able to recover, imagine what was hidden, or moved to Syria. Look, if you love the man so much, I'm not gonna be able to make a dent here -love is a strong thing.
tescosuicide said…
I don't need the link, I trust the guardian as much as I trust CNN.
AnnieAngel said…
Are you on glue? Where do I say I love Saddam? I asked you a simple question a while back that turned into all this, I asked why Allah didn't send the insurgents to take care of Saddam (especially considering saddam was secular, bin laden hated saddam and i thought he worked for allah)?

They're doing a pretty decent job of fighting the greatest army on earth, if they had risen against Saddam the whole world would have backed them but they didn't.

I asked you why and you said I was silly and went off on a tangent.

You are also the ONLY person I know to have ever claimed that the WMD Bush et all went on about have been found, yet you offer me no link to the proof of that. You suddenly offer that they have been moved to Syria, I have heard that.

But where do you get your news? I was going to use a Fox link but I always get yelled at for that.
Shoelimpy™ said…
Are you talking about the VX produced prior to the 1991 war? Cuz, um, that's old news. There still is and has been no evidence showing any sort of major production or distribution of anything after 1991. It has nothing to do with a change of heart on the part of Saddam, but rather a lack of ability. As Colin Powell or Condoleeza Rice would have told you prior to 9/11 and Bush's opportunistic grab at the neocon wet dream of war with Iraq, Saddam did not have the capability of producing WMD or conventional weapons. In the words of Colin Powell in 2001, he was neither a threat to the US or to his neighbors.
tescosuicide said…
To be honest, ever since the Katrina disaster, I can't watch the news without wanting to puke. ALL journalists are evil fucking monsters that don't give a fuck unless they're getting ratings -so, if anything has changed in Iraq since then, I would have no clue.

Your question was silly, that may have sparked the 'tangent'. I also find a 'link' to be a waste of time as the internet can be very deceiving. I form my opinions based on random reports not only from the internet and the news but also the soldiers involved... when I gave a shit. Now, as long as there is some involvement over there I have LESS to worry about. You may not agree but Sadam is not the peace loving flower child that Michael Moore makes him out to be. To me, it's one less psycho out of power.

Shoelimpy, your rant sounds like that of a political affiliation -I can't get with it as I have none. The only thing worse than a politician is a lawyer. So you know, that includes Mr Bush. Put down the Kool Aid.
AnnieAngel said…
Who brought up Michael Moore? Ummm, you. :) Who cares about Michael Moore, he's a big fat idiot only interested in making money.

I'm glad to see that you get your news from your ass. :)

So who's the pyscho in Iraq now? Is this Zarqawi the Goldstein from Orwell's 1984? Why all the praise of Sadr City one day and he's trying to kill former Presidents the next day?

Chaos brought to you by America, profitting Haliburton and the Elect(ed) few?
Shoelimpy™ said…
I have no political affiliation, save for hatred and contempt for everyone in Washington. They are all disgusting opportunists who care nothing for America or the world and only for themselves. If anything, I would say I am a Libertarian, but that is neither here nor there.

I was not ranting, I was only stating facts. Yes, Saddam did have a number of WMD, prior to the 1991 Gulf War. Possibly some of this is still hidden in the Iraqi sands, although as time goes on I find this less and less likely (and none of this had anything to do with the US or with 9/11). The fact of the matter is that the containment policies put into place after the Gulf War worked. Saddam had no capability of producing anything that would be of any threat to anyone. I trust Colin Powell far more than I trust some idiot with a right-wing message board spouting off about 4 15 year old tons of VX claiming that this justifies the war in Iraq.
AnnieAngel said…
Shoe's a Libertarian, he hates the poor. :O
tescosuicide said…
Right on Shoelimpy, it's all good. So, as far as our [USA] recent involvement with Iraq, why wouldn't Saddam allow complete inspection if he had nothing to hide? My guess is he's better at getting rid of evedence than the liberals allude... unfortunately, the liberals run the media so it's easy for them to bury the President in this situation.

Way I see it, if a cop comes to my door looking for a murder weapon that I've been accused of having, the only way I'm telling him he's not coming in to look for it is if I HAVE IT! Or if I'm a conspiracy nut who thinks the Patriot Act was created to steal my rights... cuckoos.
Shoelimpy™ said…
As I recall, there were inspectors in Iraq prior to the invasion. In fact, the UN inspectors were expelled in 2003, not by Saddam but by the United States military.

In fact, the UN had found quite a bit of material from the Gulf War, and had stockpiled it in sealed containters. AFTER the invasion, these sealed containers were found littered across Iraq, because the UN had been expelled and US soldiers thought it better to defend the oil ministry than to defend the only known stockpiles of WMD in existence in Iraq.
tescosuicide said…
Oil huh? Don't look now, you're starting to sound like a windbag -much like another Libertarian, that works for FNC.
Shoelimpy™ said…
If you actually knew what you were talking about you could have a conversation rather than making cracks about Fox News hosts.
tescosuicide said…
My advantage limpy, is that I don't listen to the windbags... therefore I'm not a Kool Aid drinker -wait, arent you Canadian?
tescosuicide said…
Here I am about to defend my intelligence to a Canadian... see ya.
AnnieAngel said…
Shoe is texan born and American military bred. He's also a graduate of Texas A&M, so that should make you feel better about defending your intelligence.

Why do you hate Canadians? I mean I hate Canada, but most Canadians are ok.

Popular posts from this blog

Burn Your Cat Stevens Records!

Marineland With My Camera